Lebanese vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lebanese
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Lebanese
Chickasaw
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
57.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,253,340 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 21.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lebanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 39.7% | 33.3% |
| Range | 37.3% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 12.7% |
| Median | 10.4% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Lebanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (8.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Fiji (8.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Chile (8.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |
| Hawaiians | 47.2 /100 | #177 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 47.1 /100 | #178 | Average 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |