Latvian vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,282,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,634,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 59.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
Minimum | 0.39% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 14.6% |
Range | 26.1% | 13.9% |
Mean | 4.8% | 6.3% |
Median | 3.8% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Bahamas (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from West Indies (6.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |