Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 466,887,426 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,634,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 44.7%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Central Asia	Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Minimum	0.66%	0.75%
Maximum	12.4%	14.6%
Range	11.8%	13.9%
Mean	3.6%	6.3%
Median	3.4%	5.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.4%	4.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	4.3%	6.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.9%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	1.8%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	1.8%	3.0%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
French Canadians	99.8 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 4.2%
Northern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 4.3%
Scottish	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 4.3%
Swiss	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 4.3%
Serbians	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 4.3%
British	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 4.3%
Australians	99.7 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 4.3%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 4.3%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 4.3%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 4.3%
Welsh	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 4.3%
Austrians	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 4.3%

Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Bahamas (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from West Indies (6.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.78%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Blackfeet	0.2 /100 \| #265	Tragic 6.2%
Creek	0.2 /100 \| #266	Tragic 6.2%
Spanish Americans	0.2 /100 \| #267	Tragic 6.2%
Alaska Natives	0.2 /100 \| #268	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 6.2%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 6.2%
Colville	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 6.3%
Barbadians	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 6.3%
Choctaw	0.1 /100 \| #275	Tragic 6.3%
Yaqui	0.1 /100 \| #276	Tragic 6.3%
Indonesians	0.1 /100 \| #277	Tragic 6.3%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.1 /100 \| #278	Tragic 6.4%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 6.4%