Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Lebanese Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 466,887,426 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,468,310 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 25.2%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Central Asia	Lebanese
Minimum	0.66%	1.5%
Maximum	12.4%	48.5%
Range	11.8%	47.0%
Mean	3.6%	11.6%
Median	3.4%	4.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.4%	3.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	4.3%	16.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.9%	12.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	1.8%	12.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	1.8%	12.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
French Canadians	99.8 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 4.2%
Northern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 4.3%
Scottish	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 4.3%
Swiss	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 4.3%
Serbians	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 4.3%
British	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 4.3%
Australians	99.7 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 4.3%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 4.3%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 4.3%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 4.3%
Welsh	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 4.3%
Austrians	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 4.3%

Demographics Similar to Lebanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Immigrants from Morocco (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Liberian (5.4%, a difference of 0.33%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Israel	27.8 /100 \| #194	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Azores	27.5 /100 \| #195	Fair 5.4%
Spaniards	27.4 /100 \| #196	Fair 5.4%
Liberians	26.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Belarus	26.2 /100 \| #198	Fair 5.4%
Uruguayans	25.0 /100 \| #199	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Morocco	24.3 /100 \| #200	Fair 5.4%
Lebanese	24.1 /100 \| #201	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	23.8 /100 \| #202	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Peru	21.8 /100 \| #203	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	19.4 /100 \| #204	Poor 5.4%
Chippewa	18.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 5.4%
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%