Immigrants from Italy vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Chickasaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Chickasaw
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,102,618 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.725 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 56.4%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 51.4% |
Range | 98.4% | 49.5% |
Mean | 16.2% | 23.7% |
Median | 9.5% | 21.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 27.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.3% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.9% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Chinese (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |