Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Celtic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Celtics
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,847,702 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 16.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Celtic |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 23.1% | 97.8% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 15.9% |
| Median | 14.4% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
| South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
| Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |