Iroquois vs Celtic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Celtic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Celtics
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 17.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Celtic |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 95.3% | 97.8% |
| Mean | 22.4% | 15.9% |
| Median | 16.7% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
| South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
| Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |