Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Celtic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Celtics
16.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,545,805 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 22.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Celtic |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 39.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 37.8% | 97.8% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 15.9% |
| Median | 14.2% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.6% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Yaqui (16.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Zaire (16.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Blackfeet (16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Latin America (16.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
| South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
| Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |