Immigrants from Ecuador vs Guyanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Guyanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Guyanese
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Guyanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,847,702 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,777,611 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.093 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 0.14%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Guyanese |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 27.5% |
| Range | 23.1% | 24.0% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 14.0% |
| Median | 14.4% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Guyanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |