Immigrants from Ecuador vs Vietnamese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Vietnamese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Vietnamese
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Vietnamese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,847,702 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,651,264 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.466 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 3.1%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Vietnamese |
Minimum | 2.8% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 25.9% | 39.9% |
Range | 23.1% | 38.7% |
Mean | 14.6% | 14.9% |
Median | 14.4% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Vietnamese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bahamas (16.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Bangladeshi (16.0%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |