Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Celtic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Celtic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Celtics
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
69.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,760,693 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Celtic |
Minimum | 2.0% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 28.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 26.1% | 97.8% |
Mean | 11.4% | 15.9% |
Median | 11.4% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Celtics by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.36%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |