Immigrants from Ecuador vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Subsaharan African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Sub-Saharan Africans
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,847,702 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 0.79%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 69.8% |
| Range | 23.1% | 69.4% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 20.8% |
| Median | 14.4% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |