Nicaraguan vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
South American Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Nicaraguans
South American Indians
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,867,505 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,615,516 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 3.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nicaraguan | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 7.8% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 41.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.6% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 21.5% | 31.1% |
| Median | 21.1% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.2% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.9% | 41.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 25.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 24.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 23.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |