Immigrants from Greece vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Greece
South American Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Greece
South American Indians
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Greece vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,211,869 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Greece and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,615,516 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 13.0%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Greece | South American Indian |
Minimum | 4.1% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 26.2% | 97.4% |
Mean | 15.4% | 31.1% |
Median | 16.1% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 41.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 25.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 23.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Greece by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Greece are Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |