Belizean vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Belizean
South American Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Belizeans
South American Indians
22.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belizean vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,694,169 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358 and weighted average of 22.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,615,516 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 8.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Belizean | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 5.4% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 57.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 52.3% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 24.6% | 31.1% |
| Median | 22.2% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.5% | 41.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 25.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 24.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 23.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Belizeans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Immigrants from El Salvador (22.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Liberian (22.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (22.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bahamas (22.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from West Indies (22.5%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |