Kenyan vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Kenyan
South American Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Kenyans
South American Indians
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs South American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,254,696 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,615,516 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 0.57%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kenyan | South American Indian |
Minimum | 6.1% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 36.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 30.8% | 97.4% |
Mean | 22.4% | 31.1% |
Median | 21.2% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.1% | 41.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 25.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 23.6% |
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and South American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |