Immigrants from Congo vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Iroquois
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Iroquois
25.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,983,877 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 25.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,850,666 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 6.1% | 11.7% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 68.9% | 88.3% |
| Mean | 26.6% | 41.3% |
| Median | 24.9% | 32.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.7% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 46.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 23.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 25.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 24.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Iroquois by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.84%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |