Brazilian vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Sri Lankan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Sri Lankans
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,153,944 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,246,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 1.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 20.6% | 45.5% |
| Range | 19.8% | 43.2% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 10.8% |
| Median | 7.9% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Sri Lankans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |