Soviet Union vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Sri Lankan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Sri Lankans
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,246,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 0.36% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 18.3% | 45.5% |
| Range | 18.0% | 43.2% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 10.8% |
| Median | 6.2% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Sri Lankans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Icelander (8.3%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |