Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 393,086,962 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 28.6%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Immigrants from Southern Europe
Minimum	3.8%	4.3%
Maximum	100.0%	36.6%
Range	96.2%	32.4%
Mean	26.8%	15.9%
Median	21.7%	14.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	17.6%	11.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.3%	20.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.6%	9.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.5%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.4%	8.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (15.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Pakistani (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), English (15.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Denmark (15.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Palestinians	94.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	94.3 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 15.1%
Dutch	94.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 15.1%
Sri Lankans	94.0 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 15.2%
Belgians	93.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Denmark	93.3 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	93.1 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	92.7 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 15.3%
Pakistanis	92.3 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 15.3%
English	92.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 15.3%
Portuguese	91.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.3%
Irish	91.5 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%
Peruvians	91.2 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.4%