Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,782,942 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 16.6%, a difference of 18.2%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Immigrants from Ethiopia
Minimum	3.8%	3.2%
Maximum	100.0%	42.7%
Range	96.2%	39.5%
Mean	26.8%	17.4%
Median	21.7%	15.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	17.6%	12.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.3%	18.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.6%	5.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.5%	8.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.4%	8.2%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Iraq (16.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Syria (16.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Hawaiian (16.6%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (16.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Portugal (16.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Lebanese	45.4 /100 \| #175	Average 16.6%
Hungarians	45.1 /100 \| #176	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	44.1 /100 \| #177	Average 16.6%
Whites/Caucasians	43.6 /100 \| #178	Average 16.6%
Hawaiians	43.4 /100 \| #179	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Syria	43.3 /100 \| #180	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Iraq	43.2 /100 \| #181	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	43.1 /100 \| #182	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Portugal	42.5 /100 \| #183	Average 16.6%
Scotch-Irish	39.6 /100 \| #184	Fair 16.7%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	35.6 /100 \| #185	Fair 16.7%
South American Indians	35.0 /100 \| #186	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Morocco	34.6 /100 \| #187	Fair 16.8%
Arabs	34.5 /100 \| #188	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	32.5 /100 \| #189	Fair 16.8%