Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,743,598 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 15.1%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Immigrants from Afghanistan
Minimum	3.8%	5.5%
Maximum	100.0%	52.3%
Range	96.2%	46.8%
Mean	26.8%	19.7%
Median	21.7%	15.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	17.6%	13.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.3%	25.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.6%	12.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.5%	9.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.4%	9.8%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Celtic (17.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Uganda	31.3 /100 \| #192	Fair 16.8%
Aleuts	28.7 /100 \| #193	Fair 16.9%
Spanish	28.6 /100 \| #194	Fair 16.9%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	25.6 /100 \| #195	Fair 17.0%
Celtics	25.2 /100 \| #196	Fair 17.0%
Spaniards	24.9 /100 \| #197	Fair 17.0%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	22.6 /100 \| #198	Fair 17.1%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	22.4 /100 \| #199	Fair 17.1%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	21.5 /100 \| #200	Fair 17.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	17.8 /100 \| #201	Poor 17.2%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	17.6 /100 \| #202	Poor 17.2%
Ugandans	17.5 /100 \| #203	Poor 17.2%
Iraqis	13.0 /100 \| #204	Poor 17.4%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	12.6 /100 \| #205	Poor 17.4%
Delaware	11.5 /100 \| #206	Poor 17.4%