Chickasaw vs Uruguayan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,695,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 21.3%.

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Yugoslavian (16.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.30%).