Immigrants from El Salvador vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Mexican American Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Mexican American Indians
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,646,043 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Mexican American Indian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 30.5% | 35.9% |
| Range | 28.3% | 33.3% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 15.1% |
| Median | 12.2% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador and Mexican American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |