Cherokee vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Mexican American Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Mexican American Indians
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,122,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 0.84%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 3.6% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 54.2% | 35.9% |
Range | 50.6% | 33.3% |
Mean | 17.8% | 15.1% |
Median | 16.3% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Mexican American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |