Iroquois vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Mexican American Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Mexican American Indians
13.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,214,183 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.8%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 3.6% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 35.9% |
Range | 96.4% | 33.3% |
Mean | 19.1% | 15.1% |
Median | 14.9% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.6% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Mexican American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Subsaharan African (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |