Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Mexican American Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Mexican American Indians
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mexican American Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,825,114 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 0.44%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 5.2% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 22.6% | 35.9% |
Range | 17.4% | 33.3% |
Mean | 13.0% | 15.1% |
Median | 12.1% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Mexican American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |