Chickasaw vs Dominican Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Dominican
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Dominicans
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Dominican Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 351,701,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 43.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Dominican |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 17.6% | 20.8% |
| Range | 16.0% | 17.9% |
| Mean | 7.8% | 9.6% |
| Median | 7.0% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Dominicans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Central American Indian (8.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute (8.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Lumbee (8.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Native/Alaskan (8.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |