Chickasaw vs South American Indian Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,101,002 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.249 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 8.6%.

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Israeli (5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Albania (5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.23%).