Chickasaw vs Nonimmigrants Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 567,493,090 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.665 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Nonimmigrants
Minimum	1.7%	3.6%
Maximum	17.6%	13.9%
Range	16.0%	10.3%
Mean	7.8%	6.9%
Median	7.0%	6.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.5%	5.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	9.6%	8.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.1%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.4%	2.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.3%	2.2%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| South America	3.1 /100 \| #237	Tragic 5.7%
Cherokee	2.7 /100 \| #238	Tragic 5.8%
Venezuelans	2.7 /100 \| #239	Tragic 5.8%
Fijians	2.5 /100 \| #240	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Panama	2.5 /100 \| #241	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	2.4 /100 \| #242	Tragic 5.8%
Somalis	2.3 /100 \| #243	Tragic 5.8%
Chickasaw	2.3 /100 \| #244	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	2.1 /100 \| #245	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	1.8 /100 \| #246	Tragic 5.8%
Iraqis	1.4 /100 \| #247	Tragic 5.9%
Cree	1.2 /100 \| #248	Tragic 5.9%
Tsimshian	1.1 /100 \| #249	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	1.1 /100 \| #250	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Ghana	1.0 /100 \| #251	Tragic 5.9%

Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are American (5.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Hungarian (5.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Peruvian (5.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Vietnam (5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Albania (5.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	45.1 /100 \| #177	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	44.9 /100 \| #178	Average 5.2%
Spanish	41.4 /100 \| #179	Average 5.3%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	39.3 /100 \| #180	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Chile	38.8 /100 \| #181	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	37.7 /100 \| #182	Fair 5.3%
Peruvians	37.6 /100 \| #183	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	35.8 /100 \| #184	Fair 5.3%
Americans	35.4 /100 \| #185	Fair 5.3%
Hungarians	34.7 /100 \| #186	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Albania	33.8 /100 \| #187	Fair 5.3%
Israelis	33.1 /100 \| #188	Fair 5.3%
South American Indians	32.5 /100 \| #189	Fair 5.3%
Ugandans	31.6 /100 \| #190	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	30.9 /100 \| #191	Fair 5.3%