Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,156,358 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 11.1%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Immigrants from Northern Africa
Minimum	1.7%	2.0%
Maximum	17.6%	44.8%
Range	16.0%	42.8%
Mean	7.8%	9.0%
Median	7.0%	5.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.5%	4.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	9.6%	9.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.1%	5.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.4%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.3%	8.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| South America	3.1 /100 \| #237	Tragic 5.7%
Cherokee	2.7 /100 \| #238	Tragic 5.8%
Venezuelans	2.7 /100 \| #239	Tragic 5.8%
Fijians	2.5 /100 \| #240	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Panama	2.5 /100 \| #241	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	2.4 /100 \| #242	Tragic 5.8%
Somalis	2.3 /100 \| #243	Tragic 5.8%
Chickasaw	2.3 /100 \| #244	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	2.1 /100 \| #245	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	1.8 /100 \| #246	Tragic 5.8%
Iraqis	1.4 /100 \| #247	Tragic 5.9%
Cree	1.2 /100 \| #248	Tragic 5.9%
Tsimshian	1.1 /100 \| #249	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	1.1 /100 \| #250	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Ghana	1.0 /100 \| #251	Tragic 5.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Bermudan (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Ottawa (5.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Malaysia	62.2 /100 \| #165	Good 5.1%
Paraguayans	61.5 /100 \| #166	Good 5.1%
Costa Ricans	61.5 /100 \| #167	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Uganda	54.9 /100 \| #168	Average 5.2%
Ottawa	54.5 /100 \| #169	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Argentina	54.4 /100 \| #170	Average 5.2%
Bermudans	52.9 /100 \| #171	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	51.3 /100 \| #172	Average 5.2%
Alsatians	51.2 /100 \| #173	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 5.2%
Marshallese	47.9 /100 \| #175	Average 5.2%
Menominee	47.8 /100 \| #176	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	45.1 /100 \| #177	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	44.9 /100 \| #178	Average 5.2%
Spanish	41.4 /100 \| #179	Average 5.3%