Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Latin America Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,700,324 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 24.4%.

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Guatemala (7.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Mexican (7.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Honduran (7.2%, a difference of 0.65%), Inupiat (7.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and British West Indian (7.1%, a difference of 1.1%).