Chickasaw vs French American Indian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
French American Indian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
French American Indians
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
16.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs French American Indian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,492,938 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.110 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 5.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | French American Indian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 17.6% | 23.6% |
Range | 16.0% | 21.5% |
Mean | 7.8% | 7.7% |
Median | 7.0% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to French American Indians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Micronesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |