Kiowa vs Creek Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Kiowa
Creek
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Kiowa
Creek
26.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Creek Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,984,677 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 26.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,486,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Creek |
| Minimum | 20.0% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 69.2% | 75.4% |
| Range | 49.2% | 68.3% |
| Mean | 34.9% | 35.3% |
| Median | 31.9% | 34.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.4% | 27.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.4% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Creek by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.98%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Apache (27.7%, a difference of 0.99%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |