Celtic vs Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Ute
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Ute
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,601,048 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 34.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Ute |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 32.8% |
| Range | 98.7% | 28.6% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 11.0% |
| Median | 5.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |