Guyanese vs Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Guyanese
Ute
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Guyanese
Ute
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,831,984 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,601,048 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 0.73%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guyanese | Ute |
Minimum | 0.88% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 13.3% | 32.8% |
Range | 12.4% | 28.6% |
Mean | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Median | 5.6% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Guyanese and Ute by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Salvadoran (6.5%, a difference of 0.56%), Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and Nepalese (6.5%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.90%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |