Celtic vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,141,464 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.48%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Celtic	Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Minimum	1.3%	1.9%
Maximum	100.0%	20.0%
Range	98.7%	18.1%
Mean	8.7%	5.8%
Median	5.4%	4.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.1%	3.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	9.4%	6.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	2.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.2%	3.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.1%	3.8%

Demographics Similar to Celtics and Immigrants from Eastern Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Southern Europe (4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.39%), Indian (Asian) (4.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Germany	96.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 4.7%
Laotians	96.6 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	96.2 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 4.7%
Pakistanis	96.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 4.7%
Tongans	95.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%
Egyptians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%