Bolivian vs Latvian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Latvian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Latvians
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Latvian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,589,682 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,591,162 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 2.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Latvian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 29.9% | 34.6% |
Range | 28.3% | 33.2% |
Mean | 8.6% | 9.2% |
Median | 7.5% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Latvians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |