Bolivian vs Chickasaw Average Family Size
COMPARE
Bolivian
Chickasaw
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Bolivians
Chickasaw
3.29
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.19
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
6.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Chickasaw Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,628,793 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 3.29. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,515 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 3.19, a difference of 3.1%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/950f9/950f9237afceb21948c4eaff19727c419ac9551b" alt="Bolivian vs Chickasaw Average Family Size"
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.25 | 2.14 |
Maximum | 4.43 | 4.35 |
Range | 2.18 | 2.21 |
Mean | 3.31 | 3.19 |
Median | 3.31 | 3.16 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.16 | 3.04 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.47 | 3.32 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.31 | 0.28 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.36 | 0.38 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.36 | 0.37 |
Similar Demographics by Average Family Size
Demographics Similar to Bolivians by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Western Africa (3.29, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (3.29, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (3.29, a difference of 0.070%), West Indian (3.29, a difference of 0.070%), and Paiute (3.29, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Immigrants | Oceania | 98.7 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Barbadians | 98.6 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Nigerians | 98.6 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 98.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 98.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 3.29 |
West Indians | 98.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 98.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Bolivians | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Immigrants | Ghana | 98.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Paiute | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Ghanaians | 98.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Asians | 97.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Puerto Ricans | 96.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Bahamians | 96.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Indonesians | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Portuguese (3.19, a difference of 0.0%), Cree (3.19, a difference of 0.020%), Nonimmigrants (3.19, a difference of 0.030%), Syrian (3.19, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Italy (3.19, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Pennsylvania Germans | 9.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.19 |
Lebanese | 9.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 7.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 7.2 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 7.1 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.19 |
Syrians | 6.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.19 |
Cree | 6.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.19 |
Chickasaw | 6.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.19 |
Portuguese | 6.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 5.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Italy | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.19 |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.19 |
Basques | 5.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.19 |
Cherokee | 4.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.18 |
Brazilians | 4.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.18 |