Bhutanese vs Tsimshian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Tsimshian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Tsimshian
49.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
48.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Tsimshian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,135,047 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 49.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358 and weighted average of 48.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 18.2% | 21.2% |
Maximum | 78.9% | 61.9% |
Range | 60.7% | 40.7% |
Mean | 51.0% | 47.0% |
Median | 51.5% | 48.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 47.0% | 39.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.1% | 57.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 18.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Tsimshian by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Scotland (49.3%, a difference of 0.020%), German (49.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Maltese (49.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Bolivian (49.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Native Hawaiian (49.1%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (48.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Welsh (48.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Iran (48.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Vietnam (48.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (48.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Germans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Hungarians | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 49.0% |
Scottish | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 49.0% |
Iranians | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 49.0% |
Sri Lankans | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 49.0% |
Greeks | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.6 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Welsh | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Tsimshian | 99.5 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 48.7% |