Bhutanese vs Tsimshian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Tsimshian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Tsimshian
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Tsimshian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,447,211 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,184,225 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.090%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 35.0% |
| Range | 55.5% | 34.3% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 14.1% |
| Median | 11.1% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Tsimshian by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.75%), Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.83%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.72%), Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |