Zimbabwean vs Chickasaw Disability Age 5 to 17
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chickasaw
Disability Age 5 to 17
Disability Age 5 to 17 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chickasaw
5.5%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Chickasaw Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,117,127 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,149,878 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 23.2%.
Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 15.2% | 53.8% |
| Range | 14.7% | 52.1% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 10.2% |
| Median | 5.3% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 8.1% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 5 to 17
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Disability Age 5 to 17
In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (5.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Scotland (5.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Lebanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Greek (5.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 5 to 17 |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 78.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.5% |
| Hawaiians | 78.0 /100 | #156 | Good 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 77.9 /100 | #157 | Good 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 77.1 /100 | #158 | Good 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 75.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.5% |
| South Africans | 73.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 69.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.5% |
| Zimbabweans | 67.2 /100 | #162 | Good 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 64.0 /100 | #163 | Good 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 61.9 /100 | #164 | Good 5.6% |
| Lebanese | 61.4 /100 | #165 | Good 5.6% |
| Greeks | 60.6 /100 | #166 | Good 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 59.3 /100 | #167 | Average 5.6% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #168 | Average 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 55.7 /100 | #169 | Average 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 5 to 17
In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Creek (6.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Ottawa (6.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Iroquois (6.9%, a difference of 0.68%), Choctaw (6.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Seminole (6.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 5 to 17 |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 6.7% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 7.1% |