Yuman vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Yuman
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Yuman
Chickasaw
77.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,678,210 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276 and weighted average of 77.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,694,826 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 6.3%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 48.6% | 54.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 51.4% | 45.4% |
| Mean | 73.6% | 80.6% |
| Median | 72.6% | 79.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.1% | 73.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.2% | 85.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.1% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.3% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Yuman by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 0.84%), Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Crow (75.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (82.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |