Yuman vs Ghanaian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Yuman
Ghanaian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Yuman
Ghanaians
43.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Ghanaian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,496 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.526 and weighted average of 43.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,506,796 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 42.2%, a difference of 2.5%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman | Ghanaian |
| Minimum | 4.1% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 60.2% | 82.9% |
| Range | 56.2% | 66.7% |
| Mean | 41.8% | 45.7% |
| Median | 42.7% | 44.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.0% | 39.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.1% | 51.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.0% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Ghanaians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Guatemalan (43.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (43.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ethiopian (43.2%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Inupiat (42.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bermudan (42.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |