Lebanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Receiving Food Stamps

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,242,297 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,706,575 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 2.3%.

Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary

Measurement	Lebanese	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	4.7%	1.1%
Maximum	33.2%	36.2%
Range	28.5%	35.1%
Mean	13.3%	15.4%
Median	9.5%	14.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.2%	11.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.2%	18.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.0%	6.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.8%	7.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.7%	7.2%

Demographics Similar to Lebanese and Immigrants from Oceania by Receiving Food Stamps

In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Armenian (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are French Canadian (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Pennsylvania German (11.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Alsatian (11.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.5%, a difference of 0.78%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Receiving Food Stamps
Taiwanese	84.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 11.0%
Whites/Caucasians	83.9 /100 \| #147	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	83.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 11.1%
Brazilians	83.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 11.1%
Soviet Union	83.1 /100 \| #150	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Spain	81.7 /100 \| #151	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	81.7 /100 \| #152	Excellent 11.1%
Lebanese	81.6 /100 \| #153	Excellent 11.1%
Armenians	81.4 /100 \| #154	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Argentina	80.4 /100 \| #155	Excellent 11.2%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	75.6 /100 \| #156	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.2 /100 \| #157	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	72.6 /100 \| #158	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Oceania	70.4 /100 \| #159	Good 11.4%
French Canadians	69.5 /100 \| #160	Good 11.4%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.4 /100 \| #161	Good 11.4%
Alsatians	68.0 /100 \| #162	Good 11.4%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	65.8 /100 \| #163	Good 11.5%
Immigrants \| Chile	65.0 /100 \| #164	Good 11.5%
Arabs	64.7 /100 \| #165	Good 11.5%
Immigrants \| Belarus	62.8 /100 \| #166	Good 11.5%