Lebanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Lebanese
Immigrants from Oceania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Lebanese
Immigrants from Oceania
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
66.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,495,735 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.32%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lebanese | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 27.5% | 20.2% |
| Range | 25.3% | 18.6% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 8.5% |
| Median | 6.3% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Lebanese and Immigrants from Oceania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |