Iranian vs Slavic Family Households
COMPARE
Iranian
Slavic
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Iranians
Slavs
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
13.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
18.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Slavic Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,654,989 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 63.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,816,335 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 64.0%, a difference of 0.13%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iranian | Slavic |
Minimum | 26.7% | 39.7% |
Maximum | 94.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 68.2% | 60.3% |
Mean | 64.0% | 65.7% |
Median | 64.9% | 65.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.6% | 60.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.7% | 72.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.4% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Slavs by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Norwegian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from North America (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |