Salvadoran vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Salvadorans
Creek
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,824,360 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.546 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 46.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Creek |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 8.9% | 30.8% |
| Range | 7.0% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 12.5% |
| Median | 5.5% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from El Salvador (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Somalia (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |