Immigrants from Iran vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iran
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Iran
Creek
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iran vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,879,747 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.838 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 56.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Iran | Creek |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 52.5% | 30.8% |
| Range | 51.0% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 12.5% |
| Median | 4.8% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iran by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |