Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Creek
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,972,414 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 49.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Creek |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 15.5% | 30.8% |
| Range | 15.3% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 12.5% |
| Median | 5.6% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |